Showing posts with label drug companies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drug companies. Show all posts

23 January 2007

Drug Companies, Part 2 - What Goes Around Comes Around


An Old Cholesterol Remedy Is New Again

sic - FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES
By MICHAEL MASON
Published: January 23, 2007

Perhaps you heard it? The wail last month from the labs of heart researchers and the offices of Wall Street analysts?

Pfizer Inc., the pharmaceutical giant, halted late-stage trials of a cholesterol drug called torcetrapib after investigators discovered that it increased heart problems — and death rates — in the test population.

Torcetrapib wasn’t just another scientific misfire; the drug was to have been a blockbuster heralding the transformation of cardiovascular care. Statin drugs like simvastatin (sold as Zocor) and atorvastatin (Lipitor) lower blood levels of LDL, the so-called bad cholesterol, thereby slowing the buildup of plaque in the arteries.

But torcetrapib worked primarily by increasing HDL, or good cholesterol. Among other functions, HDL carries dangerous forms of cholesterol from artery walls to the liver for excretion. The process, called reverse cholesterol transport, is thought to be crucial to preventing clogged arteries.

Many scientists still believe that a statin combined with a drug that raises HDL would mark a significant advance in the treatment of heart disease. But for patients now at high risk of heart attack or stroke, the news is better than it sounds. An effective HDL booster already exists.

It is niacin, the ordinary B vitamin.

In its therapeutic form, nicotinic acid, niacin can increase HDL as much as 35 percent when taken in high doses, usually about 2,000 milligrams per day. It also lowers LDL, though not as sharply as statins do, and it has been shown to reduce serum levels of artery-clogging triglycerides as much as 50 percent. Its principal side effect is an irritating flush caused by the vitamin’s dilation of blood vessels.

Despite its effectiveness, niacin has been the ugly duckling of heart medications, an old remedy that few scientists cared to examine. But that seems likely to change.
*******

Now doesn't that seem to fit in with what I had mentioned earlier here in the blog - first my speaking about the shaman vs. the drug company then my scathing rant about the drug companies themselves (goddamn legal drug overlords). Well now you see it is coming full circle, as I already knew (especially since I wear my conspiracy glasses). And is it really such a coincidence that Pfizer is closing it's plant in Williamsburg, Brooklyn? It seems that they had sunk all their money into backing this drug which caused more harm than good when all the while there has been a vitamin that does the same healing, but of COURSE they would not let you know that. In fact, there have been press releases I have seen that have tried to downplay the benefits of vitamins - and in fact the FDA does not even recognize the claims made on packaging by the makers of vitamins. Hmmm. Do you think it is also a coincidence that people who are into "health" and "vitamins" are looked down upon as new-age space cadets? Empty gurus who are holding on to a passing fad? Well the fad hasn't passed and I think more folks should look into the benefits of vitamins and healthier alternatives to Western medicine. Western medicine is based on MONEY, not health or healing. Here in the U.S. we put a program on Discovery Channel every once in a while which touts the miracles of modern medicine and medical technology in which we reapair the cleft pallet of a young Philippine child, or straighten the spine of an African boy or repair the severely deformed face of a young American girl stricken with severe Treacher-Collins disease. These are all good things, but one must understand that these are extreme medical cases that need extreme measures. Yes, we in the West are awesome for that. But not for drug therapies. We should be learning from the East in that respect. And not only learn from the East, but give people the choice to choose whatever such healing we so desire - not to try to downplay every other alternative. Sounds a lot like politics to me...and medicine should have nothing at all to do with politics.

10 January 2007

Drug Companies, Or As I Like To Call Them, Legal Drug Overlords


Shaman. What ever happened to him? How has this wonderful person been discredited to the point that we are willing to give our money, trust and personal health decisions to a faceless company that doesn't give a rats ass about whether we get well or not? But they are not discredited? How do we accept the fact that in order to try to soothe, prevent or cure one condition we must risk getting a whole host of side effects? And then we are given more drugs to help the side effects, which in turn is just making some fat bastard rich and the sick sicker. Whose original idea was it to privatize drug therapies? How did we turn away from the shaman? Far as I know, I don't think anyone had as hard a time with taking drugs to get well in the past as we do today. And I think the problem is that we are putting artificially manufactured products into our bodies.

Now, I had been taking a medicine for a while to help with my general mood (not anti-depressants) and stamina. I won't even get into how it's not covered by my health insurance for another few years (arrrghh!!) and how expensive it is. So I really can't afford it right now, being that I have other things I need to take care of in the meantime. But I had started taking a B-100 complex vitamin and realised that it seemed to have the same affect as the medication I was taking and could not afford. HA!! Never in a million years would the Overlords suggest that before you try a harsh drug therapy to take some vitamins. Vitamins?!?! Oh god no, you can get those anywhere!! I always try to be fair, so in all fairness, the expensive drug DID help me....but it's freakin' expensive. That's the point. And I don't think I've ever heard of someone having side effects from vitamins.

I don't feel that peoples best interests are at the heart of big business. The Overlords are even screwing doctors!! There is even the paradox of the "War on Drugs". Give me a break!! Why can't someone chill out and smoke a joint legally, but the Overlords can give you a pill for "restless legs"?!?! I swear to god the person who came up with that gem is laughing about how stupid people are to buy a drug for restless legs. Ohhh, you make it sound like a syndrome and then they can sell you a pill for it. Legally. What about anxiety? Marijuana will clear that right up (for the most part). Hyperactivity? Marijuana. Loss of appetite? Marijuana. Sleeplessness. Marijuana. I could list some things that I think other illegal drugs would help, but I don't want to seem like I'm promoting illegal drug use. Except Marijuana. But at one time cocaine and heroine were legal. And I just don't believe the bullshit that they are highly addictive and are harmful. So are sleeping pills, but they are legal. What's the difference you ask? Cocaine and heroine are easily accessible, some big business fat bastard can't hoard it for himself and get richer and richer. That's what drives the drug market - what can be grown or made in your backyard versus what can't and the one's that can't can be taxed and sold at whatever price some fat bastard chooses. Think about it kids. Think about it.